Pressure control with VFD on existing Booster Turbine pumps?
I am Electrical engineer looking for some hydraulic/mechanical advice on
convenience of implementing pressure control by VFD in (3) 40 HP
vertical turbine pumps.
The brand new booster Pumps station has
never being in service for 10 years as city customers complain about
the high rate/pressure releases a lot of sediment from the century old
pipeline system.Other issues arise as potential leaks / ruptures in the
pipeline. The older pumping system is still operating at a lower
pressure.
The main contractor did not install any water supply
pressure control devices such as VFDs, Backpressure valve, Recirculating
control valve or reducing impellers diameter.
The motors are
controlled through PLC and standard soft-starters/contactors I need to
justify technical and economically the high cost of 3 VFDs
My questions are:
1-
Considering the affinity laws (flow vs RPM ) and ( flow vs HP) What
kind of consideration/limitations exist by implementing pressure control
based on VFDs?
2- How to find out the min and max. permissible
variation of Pump speed (rpm) from the pump's efficiency curve rated at
1780 rpm. In my research I found out some issues might appear on speed
control affecting the pump and/or the motor efficiency, energy cost etc.
From the curve I checked that 2 pumps need to run (in parallel) to meet the target Head and GPM.
///////////////////////////////////////////
The pumps actual performance curves are very important. Each pump will
always follow its curve including the adjustments for shaft speed. The
seemingly minor shaft speed variations with load with a simple induction
motor drive actually can be significant enough to contribute to
stability with pumps in parallel if the pump curves are less than ideal:
Your minimum RPM2 must still develop the head you need to move Q2 flow at that minimum rpm.
H2 = H1/1780^2 * RPM2^2
Q2 = Q1/1780 * RPM2
Your
maximum rpm must not overpressure the system and still deliver a
flowrate at rates that your system can handle, ie must not cause
waterhammer if a valve is closed, have a flow velocity too high, draw
too much power, must not cavitate the pumps, etc.
If you have a
static head, pay close attention to H2 at RPM2 and be sure you still get
the flowrate you need. The pump efficiency may not be the same as what
you see on the pump curve.
A
common situation would be where two (or more) seemingly identical pumps
operate nicely together for a while and then some piping system
transient gets one pump to hog load a bit. Its shaft speed slows a bit,
and its head then drops a bit then another pump that had shed some load
speeds up a bit and hogs some load, and the party get going!
Now
add multiple VFD's trying to impress some sort of control on this
circus, and it is most unlikely that stability will improve.
Careful
choice of pump curve characteristics is important to having multiple
pumps play nicely together. The old advice to have curves where the
head rises continuously to shut-off is valid but can be asking a bit
much. It is most important to make sure that all of the pump curves
have suitable characteristics throughout the entire range of operating
conditions that can reasonably be expected--including start-up and
shut-down.
Pumps operating in parallel with well chosen curves
and driven by simple induction motors can be a model of inherent
stability. Add VFD's to these same pumps and motors, and stability can
quickly become a very precious commodity.
MORE NEWS